- Al Jazeera
- AlterNet
- Angry Bear
- BBC World
- Brad DeLong
- Calculated Risk
- Corporate Crime Reporter
- Credit Writedowns
- Crossing Wall Street
- Danny Schecter
- Dean Baker
- Econbrowser
- Economic Outlook Group
- FactCheck.org
- Felix Salmon
- FiveThirtyEight (Nate Silver)
- Interfluidity
- Maureen Dowd
- Media Matters for America
- Mish
- Naked Capitalism
- Nouriel Roubini
- OpenSecrets Blog
- PolitiFact
- Pragmatic Capitalism
- Project Syndicate
- Real Clear Politics
- Republic Report
- Roosevelt Institute
- Salon
- Seeking Alpha
- Talking Points Memo
- The Big Picture (Barry Ritholtz)
- The Business Insider
- The Reformed Broker (Josh Brown)
- Truthdig
- VoteVets.org
- December 2023
- January 2023
- December 2021
- December 2020
- December 2019
- December 2018
- December 2017
- September 2017
- December 2016
- September 2016
- March 2016
- October 2015
- July 2015
- January 2015
- May 2014
- February 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
Tip Jar
Stock Market
Blogroll
Archives
About TheCenterLane.com
TheCenterLane.com offers opinion, news and commentary on politics, the economy, finance and other random events that either find their way into the news or are ignored by the news reporting business. As the name suggests, our focus will be on what seems to be happening in The Center Lane of American politics and what the view from the Center reveals about the events in the left and right lanes. Your Host, John T. Burke, Jr., earned his Bachelor of Arts degree from Boston College with a double major in Speech Communications and Philosophy. He earned his law degree (Juris Doctor) from the Illinois Institute of Technology / Chicago-Kent College of Law.
© 2024 TheCenterLane.com
proSlate Theme by Pro WP Themes
Joining The Supremes
May 4, 2009
On April 30, Supreme Court Justice David Souter announced his intention to retire after the current court term recess in June. Many were surprised by this announcement. Since Justice John Paul Stevens is 89 and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 76, most Supreme Court watchers expected one of those two jurists to be the first to retire after the election of President Obama. Those who know Justice Souter all concur that he hates living in Washington, D.C. where he is a reluctant member of the capitol’s “elite”.
Watching Friday’s news programs, I was amused by the mad scramble by those on the “hard right” to organize their opposition to the confirmation of Preisdent Obama’s nominee to the high court. Obama has not yet even announced whom he intends to nominate, yet these reactionaries are already against that person. So, the fun begins . . .
Once the President makes the nomination, the Senate Judiciary Committee begins the confirmation hearings, wherein the candidate will become incessantly badgered about his or her views on abortion, gay weddings, gun control and whether the court should “intervene” by overturning patently unconstitutional laws enacted by a bought-off (Oops! — I mean “lobbied”) Congress. The Judiciary Committee then issues its report and the full Senate votes to either confirm or reject the nomination with 51 votes.
This process became a spectator sport back in 1987, when Ronald Reagan nominated the Amish-looking, Robert Bork. The Democrats immediately launched a full-on battle against the nomination, considered by many as a bit over-the-top, since it involved scrutiny of Bork’s video rentals. This particular judicial confirmation resulted in the use of the word “Bork” as a verb. Since that time, getting “Borked” described any situation wherein a political appointee became the target of a partisan attack during the confirmation process. Nevertheless, Bork’s view that the Constitution provides no guarantee of an individual’s right to privacy, justified much of the ire against him. During the confirmation hearings, he criticized the decision in Roe v. Wade. Dumb idea. Since that time, Republican nominees to any Federal Court do all they can to avoid providing straight answers to questions dealing with a woman’s right to determine whether she will carry a fetus to term.
The most entertaining confirmation hearings came along when George H.W. Bush nominated Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court in 1991. By that time, Bush appointee David Souter had already begun to disappoint the “hard right”. The administration wanted to be sure they had a hard-line conservative this time and in Thomas they found the prefect candidate to replace the court’s first African-American Justice, Thurgood Marshall, who retired. The excitement began when the committee heard testimony from Anita Hill, who had worked for Thomas at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Ms. Hill testified that while working at the EEOC, she was sexually harassed by Clarence Thomas on several occasions. The most memorable portion of her testimony concerned a remark by Thomas that his favorite porn video was a feature entitled: Long Dong Silver. Although Hill’s testimony ultimately did not block the confirmation of Thomas, people began lining up at adult book stores to purchase copies of the overnight classic. I always wondered whether a certain chain of seafood restaurants also might have benefited from that aspect of the proceedings.
At this point, many Republicans likely assume that President Obama will nominate an ultra-liberal judge to counter-balance the far-right members of the court: Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia. News outlets are already abuzz with speculation concerning the most likely nominee. The betting is heavy that Obama will nominate a woman for this vacancy because a man (Samuel Alito) was appointed by George W. Bush to replace Sandra Day O’Connor, one of only two females on the court when Bush took office. Some pundits expect Obama to nominate someone from a minority group to add a little more diversity to the court. As a result, many of these people expect Judge Sonia Sotomayor from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to get the nod. My prediction is that the President will select Judge Diane Wood from the Seventh Circuit. She shares Obama’s experience as an instructor at the University of Chicago Law School and she has a solid background.
Nevertheless, we can expect quite a bit of showboating once the confirmation process begins. It might not be as much fun as the Clarence Thomas hearings . . . but who knows?
Let the games begin!