July 1, 2010
Too many of the commentaries we see these days are either motivated by or calculated to promote hysteria. When someone expresses a rational point of view or an honest look at the skullduggery going on in Washington, it’s as refreshing as a cold beer on a hot, summer day.
With so much panic over sovereign debt and budget deficits afflicting the consensual mood, it’s always great to read a piece by someone willing to analyze the situation from a perspective based on facts instead of fear. Brett Arends wrote a great piece for MarketWatch, dissecting the debt panic and looking at the data to be considered by those implementing public policy on this issue. His essay focused on “the three biggest lies about the economy”: that unemployment is below ten percent, that the markets are panicking about the deficit and that the United States is sliding into socialism. Here is some of what he had to say:
Most people have no idea what’s really going on in the economy. They’re living on spin, myths and downright lies. And if we don’t know the facts, how can we make intelligent decisions?
High unemployment exerts a huge deflationary force on the economy. Beyond that, the income taxes those unemployed citizens used to pay are no longer helping to pick up the tab for our bloated budget. Mr. Arends emphasized the importance of looking at the real unemployment rate – what is referred to as U6 – which includes those people deliberately disregarded when counting the “unemployed”:
For example it counts discouraged job seekers, and those forced to work part-time because they can’t get a full-time job.
That rate right now is 16.6%, just below its recent high and twice the level it was a few years ago.
* * *
Consider, for example, the situation among men of prime working age. An analysis of data at the U.S. Labor Department shows that there are 79 million men in America between the ages of 25 and 65. And nearly 18 million of them, or 22%, are out of work completely. (The rate in the 1950s was less than 10%.) And that doesn’t even count those who are working part-time because they can’t get full-time work. Add those to the mix and about one in four men of prime working age lacks a full-time job.
In exploding the myth about claimed market panic concerning the debt, Arends dug back into his arsenal of common sense, explaining what would happen if the markets were panicked:
. . . the interest rate on government bonds would be skyrocketing. That’s what happens with risky debt: Lenders demand higher and higher interest payments to compensate them for the dangers.
But the rates on U.S. bonds have been plummeting recently. The yield on the 30-year Treasury bond is down to just 4%. By historic standards that’s chickenfeed. Panicked? The bond markets are practically snoring.
The specious claims about domestic socialism don’t really deserve a response, but here is how Arends dealt with that narrative:
Meanwhile, federal spending, about 25% of the economy this year, is expected to fall to about 23% by 2013. In 1983, under Ronald Reagan, it hit 23.5%. In the early 1990s it was around 22%. Some socialism.
Another prevalent false narrative being circulated lately (particularly by President Obama and his administration) concerns the hoax known as the “financial reform” bill. Wisconsin Senator Russ Feingold gave us a rare, disgusted insider’s look at how Wall Street was able to get what it wanted from its lackeys on Capitol Hill:
Since the Senate bill passed, I have had a number of conversations with key members of the administration, Senate leadership and the conference committee that drafted the final bill. Unfortunately, not once has anyone suggested in those conversations the possibility of strengthening the bill to address my concerns and win my support. People want my vote, but they want it for a bill that, while including some positive provisions, has Wall Street’s fingerprints all over it.
In fact, reports indicate that the administration and conference leaders have gone to significant lengths to avoid making the bill stronger.
Lest we forget that the financial crisis of 2008 was caused by the antics of cretins such as “Countrywide Chris” Dodd, Senator Feingold’s essay mentioned that sleazy chapter in Senate history to put this latest disgrace in the proper perspective:
Many of the critical actors who shaped this bill were present at the creation of the financial crisis. They supported the enactment of Gramm-Leach-Bliley, deregulating derivatives, even the massive Interstate Banking bill that helped grease the “too big to fail” skids. It shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone that the final version of the bill looks the way it does, or that I won’t fall in line with their version of “reform.”
As I discussed in “Your Sleazy Government at Work”, the voters will not forget about the Democrats (including President Obama) who undermined financial reform legislation, while pretending to advance it. The Democratic Party has until early 2012 to face up to the fact that their organization would be better off supporting a Presidential candidate with the integrity of Russ Feingold or Maria Cantwell if they expect to maintain control over the Executive branch of our government.
NOAA Uses Human Canaries To Test Gulf Fish
July 5, 2010
I recently checked in on the website for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for the latest update on the Deepwater Horizon oil plume. The site features a map depicting the “fishery closure area” – a rather huge section of the Gulf of Mexico consisting of over 81,000 square miles — where fishing is prohibited. I immediately began to wonder whether some of the toxic fish from the fishery closure area might swim outside of their boundary and find their way onto someone’s plate. Apparently, the folks at NOAA thought of that themselves, so they developed a testing protocol to ascertain whether Gulf fish intended for human consumption might have been contaminated with petrochemicals and/or Corexit – the creepy dispersant that has been banned in Britain, although it has been used extensively in response to the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe. Corexit 9500, when ingested, has been known to rupture red blood cells and cause internal bleeding. Here is the Material Safety Data Sheet for Corexit 9500, where you can find this useful tidbit:
What do you think NOAA’s Gulf fish testing protocol involves? Gas chromatography? Scanning electron microscopy? Guess again. They’re having people sniff the fish to determine whether it has been tainted. No kidding. Check it out:
This “sniff testing” struck me as a really stupid idea. It doesn’t sound reliable at all. It is based on the presumption that hazardous levels of numerous chemicals — often in combination — can be detected by the human olfactory sense. Has NOAA considered that these fish sniffers might be getting exposed to hazardous chemicals at levels in excess of the Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) for these substances? How many parts per million of the various petrochemicals are the testers ingesting when they sniff this fish on a continuous basis? Worse yet: How much do they ingest when they eat the fish? I would love to hear the opinion from an independent, objective panel of occupational hygienists about this testing protocol.
NOAA’s fish-sniffing project appears to be just another example of how a stupid mistake (allowing the Deepwater Horizon to operate in the first place) sets off a chain reaction of even more stupid mistakes. Let’s hope the people involved with this testing don’t suffer any unhealthful consequences from this activity. Aside from the risk of adverse physical effects, there is also a good chance that these people signed a release — exculpating “the usual suspects” from any and all liability arising from injuries sustained while conducting these tests. No good deed shall go unpunished.