A recent article written by former New York Mayor Ed Koch began with the grim observation that no criminal charges have been brought against any of the malefactors responsible for causing the financial crisis:
Looking back on 2010 and the Great Recession, I continue to be enraged by the lack of accountability for those who wrecked our economy and brought the U.S. to its knees. The shocking truth is that those who did the damage are still in charge. Many who ran Wall Street before and during the debacle are either still there making millions, if not billions, of dollars, or are in charge of our country’s economic policies which led to the debacle.
Most of us assumed that the Enron scandal had set a precedent for the prosecution of corporate financial crime. A few Enron executives received prison sentences and the CEO, Ken Lay, died while serving time. Enron’s auditor, Arthur Andersen & Company, was forced out of business. In the wake of the Savings and Loan Crisis of the late 1980s, Charles Keating and a few of his associates were indicted by the State of California. Keating eventually received a ten-year prison sentence for fraud, racketeering and conspiracy. Keating’s prosecution resulted from pressure brought by William Black, former litigation director for the Federal Home Loan Bank Board. At one point during Black’s investigation, Keating issued a written memo to one of his minions, with this directive: “If you can’t get Wright and Congress to get Black . . . Kill him dead.”
These days, William Black has been doing quite a bit of speaking and writing about the need to initiate criminal proceedings against the culprits responsible for causing the financial crisis. On December 28, Black characterized the failure to prosecute those crimes as “de facto decriminalization of elite financial fraud”:
The FBI and the DOJ remain unlikely to prosecute the elite bank officers that ran the enormous “accounting control frauds” that drove the financial crisis. While over 1000 elites were convicted of felonies arising from the savings and loan (S&L) debacle, there are no convictions of controlling officers of the large nonprime lenders. The only indictment of controlling officers of a far smaller nonprime lender arose not from an investigation of the nonprime loans but rather from the lender’s alleged efforts to defraud the federal government’s TARP bailout program.
What has gone so catastrophically wrong with DOJ, and why has it continued so long? The fundamental flaw is that DOJ’s senior leadership cannot conceive of elite bankers as criminals.
* * *
Our best bet is to continue to win the scholarly disputes and to continue to push media representatives to take fraud seriously. If the media demands for prosecution of the elite banking frauds expand there is a chance to create a bipartisan coalition in Congress and the administration supporting prosecutions. In the S&L debacle, Representative Annunzio was one of the leading opponents of reregulation and leading supporters of Charles Keating. After we brought several hundred successful prosecutions he began wearing a huge button: “Jail the S&L Crooks!” Bringing many hundreds of enforcement actions, civil suits, and prosecutions causes huge changes in the way a crisis is perceived. It makes tens of thousands of documents detailing the frauds public. It generates thousands of national and local news stories discussing the nature of the frauds and how wealthy the senior officers became through the frauds. All of this increases the saliency of fraud and increases demands for serious reforms, adequate resources for the regulators and criminal justice bodies, and makes clear that elite fraud poses a severe danger. Collectively, this creates the political space for real reform, vigorous regulators, and real prosecutors.
Hedge fund manager, David Einhorn (author of interviewed by Charlie Rose. At one point during the interview, Charlie Rose asked Einhorn to address the argument that regulators lacked the tools necessary for preventing the financial crisis. Mr. Einhorn gave this response:) was recently
I would actually disagree with that. I think that the problem was that the laws were not enforced. After Enron you had Sarbanes Oxley. And there have been hardly any prosecutions under Sarbanes Oxley. You put in a tough anti-fraud law. The CEO has to sign there is no fraud.
The CFO has to sign that the financial statements are correct. If it’s not, there are going to be criminal consequences to all of this. And the result was that effectively you passed a law but then they didn’t enforce the law.
And once the bad guys figured out that the law wasn’t being enforced, it effectively provided cover because everybody said, look we have the tough antifraud law. The fraud must have gone away.
We often hear the expression “crime of the century” to describe some sensational act of blood lust. Nevertheless, keep in mind that the financial crisis resulted from a massive fraud scheme, involving the packaging and “securitization” of mortgages known to be “liars’ loans”, which were then sold to unsuspecting investors by the creators of those products — who happened to be betting against the value of those items. In consideration of the fact that the credit crisis resulting from this scam caused fifteen million people to lose their jobs as well as an expected 8 – 12 million foreclosures by 2012, one may easily conclude that this fraud scheme should be considered the crime of both the last century as well as the current century.
While many people have been getting excited about the “insider trading” investigation currently underway, I have been sitting here, wearing my tinfoil hat, viewing the entire episode as a diversionary tactic to direct public attention away from the crimes that caused the financial crisis. Fortunately, I am not the only cynic with such an outlook. Jesse Eisenger recently wrote a piece for the DealBook blog at The New York Times entitled, “The Feds Stage a Sideshow While the Big Tent Sits Empty”. Here is some of what Eisenger had to say about the “insider trading” investigation:
In fact, plenty of people on Wall Street are happy about the investigation. The ones with clean consciences like the idea that the world of special access to favorable tips is being cleaned up.
But others are pleased for a different reason: They realize the investigation is a sideshow.
All the hype carries an air of defensiveness. Everyone is wondering: Where are the investigations related to the financial crisis?
John Hueston, a former lead Enron prosecutor, wonders, “Have they committed the resources in the right place? Do these scandals warrant apparent national priority status?”
Nobody from Lehman, Merrill Lynch or Citigroup has been charged criminally with anything. No top executives at Bear Stearns have been indicted. All former American International Group executives are running free. No big mortgage company executive has had to face the law.
There’s an old saying: “Justice delayed is justice denied.” The government has demonstrated that it is in no hurry to bring any significant criminal charges against the perpetrators of the crimes that caused the financial crisis. With the passing of time, it becomes increasingly obvious that those crimes will go unpunished. The cause of justice is simply no match for the ability of certain individuals to operate “above the law”. In fact, it never has been.