July 24, 2008
Libertarian Party Presidential candidate, Bob Barr, turned some heads when the July 6 Zogby Poll had him capturing 6% of the nationwide popular vote. Given the fact that Barr has received almost no national media attention, some commentators began to take notice of this interesting candidacy. Of particular concern is Barr’s impact on the races in those “battleground” states that draw attention in polls. Conservative blogger, Kevin Tracy, has complained that the poll results listed on RealClearPolitics.com, do not disclose Barr’s numbers. As for the “battleground” states, Zogby has Barr with 8% of the vote in Colorado, 7% of the vote in Ohio, 7% of the vote in McCain’s home state of Arizona, and 6% of the vote in Florida. A July 22 Rasmussen Poll had Barr getting 5% of the vote in Georgia, in contrast with the July 8 Zogby result of 8% for Georgia. MSNBC’s polling expert, Chuck Todd, reported that the July 23 MSNBC/Wall Street Journal poll results showing Barr with only 2% have a much greater margin of error than the results for a two-way race because only a “half-sample” was used for the four-way race that included Barr and Ralph Nader. He suspected that a full sample would likely indicate a larger number for Barr.
So far, Barr is on the ballot in 31 states. He has a fight underway to get on the ballot in West Virginia. In Ohio, Federal Judge Edmund Sargus, Jr. held that the Ohio state Legislature failed to revise ballot rules after they were struck down as unconstitutional in 2006 by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Ohio Secretary of State, Jennifer Brunner (a Democrat) is seeking an expedited appeal. Of course, the court hearing her appeal will again be the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, so a victory for Barr seems likely there, as well.
Barr has an interesting background that makes him well-suited for the Presidency at this time. To start with, in 1966, he graduated from High School in Tehran, Iran. In 1970 he received his Bachelor’s Degree, cum laude, from the University of Southern California. He received a Master’s Degree in International Affairs from George Washington University in 1972. He received his law degree from Georgetown in 1977. During that time (1971 – 1978) Barr was employed by the Central Intelligence Agency. Barr served in Congress as the Representative for Georgia’s 7th Congressional District from 1995 to 2003. In Congress, he served as a senior member of the Judiciary Committee, as Vice-Chairman of the Government Reform Committee, as a member of the Committee on Financial Services and the Committee on Veteran’s Affairs.
Despite the lack of media attention, he is running a clever campaign. On July 19, he made a surprise appearance at the Netroots Nation blogger conference, stealing a bit of attention from the “surprise” visit by Al Gore. On July 22, while John McCain was visiting Manchester, New Hampshire, he drew a bit of attention away from McCain’s visit to that city by appearing there himself. Mark Hayward of the New Hampshire Union Leader, reported on July 23 that Barr spent a good deal of time at a stop in Manchester, “explaining his disappointments with the way the war in Iraq and the Patriot Act turned out.” Barr voted in favor of both the Patriot Act and the Joint Resolution for the Use of Military Force in Iraq. Although Barr is not yet on the ballot in New Hampshire, the Zogby Poll has him at 10 percent in that state.
As the campaign progresses, it will be interesting to observe where Barr gets his support. MSNBC’s Chuck Todd pointed out that there is a component of “anti-Obama” voters among Barr’s supporters. Whether this comes from racism, belief in the “secret Muslim” rumors, or a perceived lack of experience, will make for an interesting study. It would also be interesting to ascertain whether any Obama supporters shifted their allegiance to Barr as a result of Obama’s vote in favor of the FISA “wiretap” bill. Polls taken in the wake of that vote (July 11 Newsweek and July 13 Rasmussen) showed Obama’s support among independent voters dropping significantly. Did they see Obama’s compromise on this issue as a lack of authenticity?
For now, Barr’s candidacy is perceived primarily as a threat to John McCain. As Faye Fiore reported in the July 23 Los Angeles Times:
Barr is regularly compared to Ralph Nader, the Green Party spoiler who drew crucial votes from Democrat Al Gore in 2000. Worried McCain supporters have begged Barr to drop out. The renegade responds with his famous bespectacled glare, referring to himself in the third person, as is his habit: “The GOP has no agenda, no platform and a candidate who generates no excitement. That’s not Bob Barr’s fault.”
When confronted about being a McCain “spoiler” during the July 6 edition of CNN Newsroom, Barr responded:
This is precisely the problem with the two-party system that we have here. They are always looking for someone to blame, other than themselves.
. . . This preemptive blaming doesn’t do either party very well. It’s an awfully weak position for the McCain campaign and the Republicans to be in months out from the election, already blaming me for their loss.
It will be interesting to watch what the pollsters can learn from Barr’s candidacy. As Barr gets more publicity, his popularity is likely to increase. If he can make it to 10 percent in a nationwide poll, he will be invited to participate in some of the debates. That would be very interesting.
A McCain – Edwards Ticket
August 11, 2008
As mid-August approaches, the Hillarologists are preparing to descend upon Denver to vent their spleens at the Democratic Convention. We’ve seen videos of them at backyard parties, cheering for their fallen hero, and shouting out for … uhh … catharsis? As their hearts filled with rage, visions of sexists danced in their heads: the usual big-mouths who weren’t used to restraining themselves while making on-air comments. Most of the liberally-inclined men I know, couldn’t understand the charges of sexism in media coverage of the Presidential campaign, as alleged by Clinton’s supporters. That’s because these men don’t watch Fox News or the likes of Glenn Beck. Had they watched Keith Olbermann’s Countdown program a while back, they would have been treated to a sampling of some ugly, sexist remarks, as rebroadcast to an audience who, for the most part, tended to avoid the White House echo chamber.
Suddenly, Hillary’s female activists have a big distraction. John Edwards (age 55) has now admitted to having an affair with a dilettante filmmaker named Rielle Hunter (age 44). Edwards has admitted to having the affair that began after his wife, Elizabeth (now age 58), had been diagnosed with cancer. To the Hillarologists, the Edwards caper sounded all too familiar. It was yet another case of “throw your first wife under the bus” syndrome, with the added feature of doing so while she is in the throes of a medical crisis. The Clinton supporters must have been reminded of a similar situation involving another candidate in the 2008 Presidential campaign: John McCain.
Sharon Churcher provided an informative history of McCain’s first marriage in the June 8 issue of Britain’s Daily Mail. Her article described how McCain (who turns 72 at the end of this month) married the sexy swimwear model named Carol Shepp in 1965. Carol is only two years younger than John. Carol had been previously married to one of McCain’s Annapolis classmates, by whom she had two sons: Douglas and Andrew. When McCain married Carol, he adopted her sons. During the Christmas season of 1969, while McCain was a prisoner in Viet Nam, Carol was driving to a friend’s house and experienced a horrible automobile accident. A few hours after the accident, she was found next to the wreckage of her car, having been thrown through the windshield. Churcher’s article went on to point out that after McCain’s release from the “Hanoi Hilton” and upon his reunion with Carol in 1973, he first learned of Carol’s injuries. She was no longer the tall model he remembered. Her doctors “had been forced to cut away huge sections of shattered bone in her legs, taking with it her tall, willowy figure” as Churcher explained.
The Daily Mail article mentioned a man named Ted Sampley, who fought with the Special Forces in Viet Nam. Mr Sampley was quoted as saying:
The article included the following quote from Carol about McCain’s reason for leaving her:
The disgruntled Hillarologists must be aware of the pattern here: opportunistic male politician strays from his first wife after she sustains a physical setback. The 2008 Presidential campaign brought us two candidates with the same modus operandi. The fact that they are from different parties shouldn’t exclude John Edwards as a running mate for John McCain. After all, non-Republican Joe “The Tool” Lieberman has been vying for that spot for over a year.