September 11, 2008
The first time I ever voted in a Presidential election was when I decided to vote for the Libertarian candidate, Roger MacBride. I agreed with the principles of the Libertarian Party. They had good writers, putting their message together in a way that could gain the enthusiasm of those not electrified by “Oatmeal Man” Gerald Ford, or by the tranquil Jimmy Carter. Although they have not managed to get many charismatic candidates to act as their standard-bearers, the Libertarians finally have one this year. Bob Barr served in Congress as the Representative for Georgia’s 7th Congressional District from 1995 to 2003. In Congress, he served as a senior member of the Judiciary Committee, as Vice-Chairman of the Government Reform Committee, as a member of the Committee on Financial Services and the Committee on Veteran’s Affairs. Although he was a harshly partisan antagonist of Bill Clinton during the impeachment promotion, he subsequently took on a relaxed, charming demeanor, winning over the usually “cold room” for conservatives on HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher. In 2004, he left the Republican Party to join the Libertarian Party.
Bob Barr is now running for President, as the candidate of the Libertarian Party. In 1988, Ron Paul was the Libertarian Party’s Presidential candidate. You may remember Ron Paul from the 2008 Republican primaries, occasionally beating Rudy Giuliani and the other “also-rans” of this past spring.
On September 10, Barr’s campaign manager, Bob Varney, issued a press release, disclosing that Bob Barr has invited GOP Congressman Ron Paul to be his running mate in the upcoming Presidential election. The press release disclosed that:
In a letter sent to Paul, Barr called Paul one of the “few American patriots” who exist in today’s society, and asked him to “seriously consider this final offer as an opportunity to show true, lasting leadership beyond party politics”.
Wayne Allyn Root, who has been Barr’s running mate in this election, was quoted in the press release as expressing support for the selection of Ron Paul as Barr’s new running mate:
Understanding Dr. Ron Paul’s reputation and name recognition in the freedom movement, I am willing to step aside as Libertarian vice presidential candidate if he would be willing to take my place. I will pledge to work day and night, just as I have as the vice presidential nominee, to support Dr. Paul. I believe this is a wonderful opportunity for the Libertarian and freedom movements. I encourage Dr. Paul to accept Congressman Barr’s offer.
Many might consider this entire idea as the daydream of some “fringe” political group. Nevertheless, you may want to look down the road (as the Libertarians obviously are) to a scenario wherein Sarah Palin, for whatever reason, alienates the centrist Republicans and independents, who may have otherwise voted for McCain. These people might then vote for Bob Barr. Add to the mix, those not currently enthusiastic about a McCain Presidency, who just can’t get motivated to vote for Barack Obama (for whatever reason). With Ron Paul on his ticket, Barr has the possibility of winning enough electoral votes to prevent McCain or Obama from winning a majority of Electors as a result of the general election, in the event that “wild card” Palin turns out to be a disaster. If that happens and no single candidate has a majority of Electors in the Electoral College, the Twelfth Amendment requires that the Presidential election shall be decided in the House of Representatives. Since Bob Barr and Ron Paul both served in the House, unlike Barack Obama, there is a chance that Barr could win the Presidency. The mere fact that the Democrats have a majority in the House is of no consequence. The Twelfth Amendment requires that each State shall vote in the House as a single delegation, with each State having only one vote. That vote would be determined by the majority of a State’s Representatives voting for a particular candidate. He who has 26 States, wins. (The Vice-President is elected by the Senate, making a McCain/Paul administration possible.) With Sarah Palin as McCain’s running mate, a Barr/Paul Libertarian ticket could get some breathing room. If there is enough breath to carry that ticket out of the Electoral College, we could be in for some wild times.
Fun With Bill And Hill
I had always been one of the skeptics on the issue of what support Bill and Hillary Clinton would provide to Barack Obama’s Presidential campaign. The fight for their party’s nomination lasted longer than it should have. Hillary’s reluctance to concede defeat underscored longstanding doubts about whether she could ever support Obama as the inevitable Democratic Party nominee. The most outspoken skeptic on this subject has been Maureen Dowd. Her column in the New York Times on August 19 (just before the Democratic Convention) described a fictional meeting between John McCain and Hillary Clinton. The article, entitled Two Against The One, described the following imaginary, conspiratorial conversation between Hillary and McCain:
I had voiced my own doubts about whether the Clintons would support the Obama candidacy, back on June 5:
Whatever motivated her to continue on, ultimately resulted in the dissociative speech she gave on the night of Tuesday, June 3, 2008, when Barack Obama earned enough delegates to guarantee himself the Democratic Presidential nomination. She spoke to her relatively small audience of sycophants and losers, as though she had just assured the nomination for herself. On the following day, she was faced with conference calls from 28 House members and 8 Senators, both pledged delegates and superdelegates for Clinton. According to Howard Fineman of Newsweek, these people made it clear that they were beyond disappointment that she had not given a concession speech. They were outraged by her arrogance and gave her an ultimatum: Hillary must release them as her delegates, or they would endorse Obama, regardless of her consent. Hillary agreed to a concession event, to take place on Saturday, June 7, at which time she would formally endorse Obama.
My suspicions continued for another two months and on August 7, I wrote this about the upcoming convention:
Forget the OxyContin (at least for this weekend). Rush Limbaugh is going to be on a “natural high”, because his favorite fantasy might just become reality. The Clintons are in “full hostility” mode and the Hillarologists are planning a parade and more for the convention in Denver. Limbaugh has attempted to claim credit for the likely showdown in Denver, with his own label: “Operation Chaos”.
Nevertheless, by the time the Convention began, the Clintons were on board for Obama and both gave great speeches for the Obama – Biden ticket. On August 28, I felt humbled enough to say this about Senator Clinton’s performance at that event:
After hearing her speech, I felt motivated to apologize for publicly doubting her loyalty to the Democratic Party. She really did “deliver the goods” by giving what was, perhaps, her best speech on the campaign stump. Although many of us were surprised by the substance of her speech, I was particularly impressed by her delivery. Hillary had always addressed her audiences with Lieberman-esque stiffness. Imagine someone saying “let us go forward” with a groaning, insincere tone for the 10,000th time. That was the way Hillary used to speak. In defeat, she really did find her voice.
Since that time, both Hillary and Bill Clinton have been working hard along the campaign trail, proving themselves as essential compatriots in the Obama – Biden campaign. The best example of this took place on October 30, when Bill Clinton delivered his rousing speech in support of Obama, before a crowd of 35,000 in Kissimmee, Florida. His remarks urging supporters to “get out the vote” for Obama, made it clear that he had no shortage of enthusiasm for this former foe:
For a candid look at Hillary Clinton’s real attitude about the Obama campaign, the November 2 article by Carrie Budoff Brown and Glenn Thrush on the Politico website is essential reading. The following passage described what was really going on in Hillary’s mind during the days before her concession speech:
Both Bill and Hillary Clinton surprised many of us with their tireless efforts for the Obama – Biden campaign, despite the “bad blood” that had been spilled during the primary season. Their conduct will surely be viewed by history as an exemplary model for party unity.